Sign below an article you find excellent. Unsigned or undated votes and nominations will be thrown out. IP votes carry less weight than votes cast by a registered user, because anonymous IPs are grovelling insects in our eyes.

If your vote or nomination does not have a timestamp, it will be ignored.

Feel free to add an article - new ones at the top. You may nominate and vote for your own articles if you so choose - please note it on your nomination.

When nominating an article, the template Template:VFH should be added to the end of the entry using {{VFH}}. A featured article should have the template replaced with {{FA}}, adding the date and revision. Anything you add {{VFH}} to also shows up in Category:Feature nomination.

This novel VFH is also available in paperback.

Failed VFH nominations should only be archived/removed by the sysops who pay attention to this sort of thing.

Previous featured articles can be found on the archive pages.

THIS IS NOT A DISCUSSION PAGE.

If you feel the need to whine or start flamewars please do it HERE. Violators of this policy will be SHOT.

Survivors will be given a DIGESTIVE BISCUIT.

Then we shoot them again.

Current Nominations (new stuff at top, prefix votes with * )

SELF-NOMINATION REGULATION: self-nominated articles (i.e. you write an article and then decide to nominate it yourself) must be at least a week old before nomination. Articles nominated by people other than the author can still be nominated at any time.

VANITY REGULATION: Articles that meet the criteria for vanity may not be nominated.

Captain's log

Nomination and vote. - A comment on the article's talk page suggested that it be featured. I was so pleased, I thought I'd give it a try. I guess this is a pseudo-self-nomination. --Bear 07:06, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
For. More self-references! (And the image, too.) - Sir Sikon [Guest] Ub5.10 Fx1.5 F@H NS³ FIC CM² 08:30, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
Weak for. Love the premise. Give it some more work and I'll upgrade that to a full for. --Hobelhouse 01:29, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Comment: I added a bit on expendable crew. I'm not sure what else to do, given that the premise is the lack of a premise. :) Anyone care to take a whack at it? I'd appreciate some fresh eyes. --Bear 02:38, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Against- A few mildly interesting moments, but mostly dry. Das Boot 07:25, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
For. • Spang • CUN | talk • 01:27, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
Weak Against. Meh... t o m p k i n s blah. F@H CUN VFH CM NS MORE FOULS, LESS BOWELS 01:30, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
Against - No idea what you're talking about --Mr Gridenko 17:46, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Pasketmaul

Re-Nomination - I've had a big fiddle with this article, and I think its a huge improvement on when it was last nominated a couple of months ago. (Das Boot 05:46, 15 April 2006 (UTC))

Yes - Brilliant article, major improvements, far better than when last nominated. (Fall-asleep-now 18:47, 15 April 2006 (UTC))

Good For - It has a network of articles now, should be good. Wahoo 9:22, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

YES - Im addicted to this one,i check everyday for updates. Pantera102 22:24, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
For. Golly, the world government has been overthrown by Pasketmaul. Bloopy 11:11, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

~~For~~ ~~Against~~ I can't decide. --Zim_ulator (Talk - Edits Logs) (Zim_ulator and Evelyn the Modified Dog) 15:20, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

For I like articles that have linked full-article inside them, like this. I think that needs to be done more. -- Cheer up! Hitler's still dead. 02:22, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Against I don't get what this article is trying to do at all. Google only gets four hits on 'Pasketmaul' one of which says it's some form of elephant polo (which does bring up an amusing visual of elephants on horseback playing polo, but that's beside the point). I feel like this is some in-joke I'm outside of. Other than that, the word Pasketmaul is inherently annoying and the article is extremely light on stuff that's actually funny and not just random. Doug 03:04, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

- First up, as far as I know, Pasketmaul is not actually a sport; its just a heavily revised version of elephant polo, with a new name. Second, elephant polo is like polo, except played on elephants instead of horses, not elephants ON horses. I agree with you on the annoyingness of the word Pasketmaul though....one part of the article I did not write. Das Boot 04:59, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

For, on the condition that this is featured with it. :] --Maj. Lady Katie (talk) (complain) 01:05, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
For. Time has been taken to create. More articles like this please. Hindleyite 10:35, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Leporiphobia

Self-nominate and for. I've been sitting on this one and I just realized I may have waited too long, what with Easter coming up and all. ::sigh:: Ah well, it's funny year-round.--> Brad Frasier National Co-Anchor CUN [talk] 04:41, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
Weak against. It's good but not for feature, maybe with some expansion.--Rataube 12:30, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
Yes and its timely given Easter. Dame IMGECUN VFH VFP PMS •YAP• 12:32, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
Yes but run it on Easter Day. --Carlb 15:47, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
Oh yeah. This would be perfect for Easter.. we just need some more votes. t o m p k i n s blah. F@H CUN VFH CM NS MORE FOULS, LESS BOWELS 15:49, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
For. (Happy?) – Captain Hinoa (Whine) (MUN) 16:25, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Maybe. t o m p k i n s blah. F@H CUN VFH CM NS MORE FOULS, LESS BOWELS 16:26, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

For. Bloopy 16:32, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
For and I'm cooking Rabbit stew for Easter Sunday dinner. Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 17:47, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
Nah - too random for my taste, especially the list... Maybe has something to do with how the Russian Easter has nothing to do with rabbits... - Sir Sikon [Guest] Ub5.10 Fx1.5 F@H NS³ FIC CM² 18:21, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
For. And a quick-featuring in time for Easter would be nice, too. • Spang • CUN | talk • 09:42, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
For Pretty funny, perfect for Easter in the US, at least. --Zim_ulator (Talk - Edits Logs) (Zim_ulator and Evelyn the Modified Dog) 15:07, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
For anything with cute and fuzzy bunnies in it. Especially casserole. Also for this being featured on Easter. Imrealized 23:33, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Semi-featured for Easter, but I'm leaving it here for a possible full featuration later. So voting is still open. --—Rc (Talk) 07:32, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

What the hell is this

Vote for. Self-nom because people have been posting some shit articles as of late and I felt I could sneak one in. --ENeGMA 02:48, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
What the hell is this? Against. > 02:51, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
For because I like the thimble.—Sir Mandaliet ♠ CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 10:12, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Against. I like self-references a lot, but this one isn't that good.--Rataube 17:29, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
For. Yes, I apparently love everything now. (But comon, this is FUNNY!)--> Brad Frasier National Co-Anchor CUN [talk] 18:41, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Against--2nd Lt. Claudius Prime 20:16, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
For Because we play this game all the time when visit my mother-in-laws house and are confronted with her collection of ceramic cats. Dame IMGECUN VFH VFP PMS •YAP• 22:46, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Agaisnt 'Nuff Said --PiOfFive 13:32, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
WEAK NEG-A-TIVE. I like it. I do. But it's not very encyclopedic. Remove the vanity at the end, and make the tone more authoritative, and I'll be for it. --2nd Lt.Yellow Dalek EX- TER- MI- NATE! (O-BEY!) 13:42, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

CommentI changed it some. The ending wasn't very funny, so I dropped it, and I changed the tone to make it more 'Encyclopedia' like without changing much content. Made some additions/revisions. --ENeGMA 15:19, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

For I was asking myself "What the HELL is this?" the entire time I was reading it. Nice job. Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 17:43, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
For What the hell is this? I liked it. Someone should stick some more stupid pictures on it though. Arzikl 22:48, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
For. • Spang • CUN | talk • 09:45, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
For It made me laugh. Also, I experienced a "little Satori" when I encountered the word "sockflobbit" for the first time. Or maybe that was a mini-stroke. --Zim_ulator (Talk - Edits Logs) (Zim_ulator and Evelyn the Modified Dog) 14:53, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Little boy who lives down the street

Self Nomination and For Just because my mother tried using it on our son last weekend, and it worked. Dame IMGECUN VFH VFP PMS •YAP• 00:20, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Linked and for. –Captain Hinoa [TALK] [MUN] 00:22, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Against.-- 00:44, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
For. Much funnier than that old woman. ;)--> Brad Frasier National Co-Anchor CUN [talk] 18:40, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
For--2nd Lt. Claudius Prime 22:57, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Nah--Rataube 10:46, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
For Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 17:49, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
For It's a nice, sedate piece which can be used as bait to redirect readers to the seamy side of Uncyclopedia. --Zim_ulator (Talk - Edits Logs) (Zim_ulator and Evelyn the Modified Dog) 14:40, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
For - I've enjoyed this entire neighborhood. Imrealized 23:37, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
Weak Against. Prefer "Old Woman" t o m p k i n s blah. F@H CUN VFH CM NS MORE FOULS, LESS BOWELS 06:26, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Mozilla Firefox

Someone added the VFH template to the page, but didn't make a heading. Anyway, I'm FOR it - we can make fun of anime nerds and FF fanboys at the same time! --Poofers 11:47, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

For - David Gerard 14:04, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
Better to say, someone forgot to remove the VFH template after it was removed from VFH due to stagnation... Anyway, self-for. - Sir Sikon [Guest] Ub5.10 Fx1.5 F@H NS³ FIC CM² 14:14, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
For. -- osirisX Discuss 22:56, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
For. Yes, this is still awesome.--> Brad Frasier National Co-Anchor CUN [talk] 02:46, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
Against. Conniption 13:54, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
For. Funny. Bloopy 08:54, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Against--2nd Lt. Claudius Prime 17:56, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Meh, why not? --officer designate MUN NS CM ZM WH 18:08, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Four heh, I didn't think the four would work with all them 's. I like the writing, about half-understand the Linuxy stuff and still found it funny. Pics, links, good formatting, what more could Oscar Wilde want in a date? --Zim_ulator (Talk - Edits Logs) (Zim_ulator and Evelyn the Modified Dog) 00:27, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
For That FireFox is hot! -- Dog Fart Trombone 16:00, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
For Although I didn't really "read" it, I did enjoy looking at the words, and that fine ass picture of firefox. (not the anime, the Clint Eastwood...) --The Captain Zombiebaron MUN, ⌘, UGotM, CM, POW (shout) 04:48, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
I was amused. For. —DroneBot2000 [Hinoa] [MUN] 05:25, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
For. And not just because it's similar to my name. KaloFoxfire 12:30, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
For. Parts of it are good, parts are not so good. It's still some of the better material.--Anon32 19:37, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
For Funny, stupid, lengthy, droll... certainly the best face of Uncyclopedia! Excuse me, I'm giddy from the fumes. --Zim_ulator (Talk - Edits Logs) (Zim_ulator and Evelyn the Modified Dog) 14:04, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
For Ha ha. We need more great articles like this one.--Arzikl 12:48, 15, April 2006 (UTC)
For nice 24.173.180.1, please sign your vote next time. Thanks! — [TALK] [MUN] 12:34, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Vote Fish Penis

I was alerted to this one when LinkTGF said on IRC, "that vote fish penis article has fucked my brain up". It does a pretty good job of the promise of the title IMO. Nominate and For - David Gerard 17:53, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

For. Mumble mumble mumble... ~~blame~~ thank keitei   t o m p k i n s  blah. F@H CUN VFH CM NS MORE FOULS, LESS BOWELS 19:16, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
For. Grumble grumble grumble... --Zim_ulator (Talk - Edits Logs) (Zim_ulator and Evelyn the Modified Dog) 21:01, 23 March 2006 (UTC
For. Penis penis penis... --Joe!&MUN&F@H&KIA&C^2&N^1 23:41, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
Against. - Sir Sikon [Guest] Ub5.10 Fx1.5 F@H NS³ FIC CM² 06:46, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
For, because campaign slogans almost never make any sense.--> Brad Frasier National Co-Anchor CUN [talk] 20:05, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
For this article, I am politically motivated (and even oddly compelled) to cast my vote. --DWIII OUN CUN 09:08, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
For methods of mass-hypnosis. -- > 21:20, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Ewww.... For I liek dirty humor Flourentina 00:12, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
Penispenispenis. --Maj. Lady Katie (talk) (complain) 02:17, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
No. --Guffy (guff) 11:59, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
Nope. Dame IMGECUN VFH VFP PMS •YAP• 23:05, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
For - Rough in spots and flat in others, in the end, vote fish penis has not only garnered my vote but somehow made me travel in time to 1987. — Fire! 13:55, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
Against---2nd Lt. Claudius Prime 22:12, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
For. Fish Penis. -Ximm the Odd, Defender of The Space Five Inches In Front of His Eyes 30 March 2006
Against. Conniption 13:54, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
Make it so --hail20:23, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
For it kept my attention for..... 2-- Here 16:10, 7 April 2006 (UTC) minutes... Way to go!
For.--Rataube 17:49, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

For Because I want to see the phrase "fish penis" on the front page. ---- Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer and WotM 19:51, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Fish Penis. • Spang • CUN | talk • 23:07, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
For WHAT THE FUCK? --[CUN] [TALK] NS FP F@H 18:00, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
For God, it'll be awesome to go to the mainpage and see that jesusfish with its junk circled...heh --The Captain Zombiebaron MUN, ⌘, UGotM, CM, POW (shout) 13:08, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
Against!—Sir Mandaliet ♠ CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 10:47, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Against It does not smell of VFH --PiOfFive 13:29, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Robot uprising

+ This one has a story behind it. It started out as Howto:Survive a Robot Uprising, but after consultation between Fasmine, Nytrospawn, and myself, it was merged here with my own material. Go and vote for, guys! --Hobelhouse 00:07, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

For. Eh, whatever.   – SUR  IMGECUN VFH NS jibba-jabba 00:50, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
For. -- osirisX Discuss 06:58, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
For--Rataube 22:11, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
For. --Joe!&MUN&F@H&KIA&C^2&N^1 22:47, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
For - David Gerard 08:01, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
For --Claudius Prime 18:19, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Weak for. Eh, not having Famine voting for all over this one makes this JUST good enough for a vote from me.--> Brad Frasier National Co-Anchor CUN [talk] 19:09, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
AF-FIR-MA-TIVE!!! Even if it is sadly lacking a Dalek contingency. --2nd Lt.Yellow Dalek EX- TER- MI- NATE! (O-BEY!) 19:26, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Against Unoriginal and uninspired. ~Sir Famine, Vandal ♣er 15:42, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
Agin'. Not very funny, relies on the word "fuck" to save it's sorry ass. IMHO as a n00b. --Zim_ulator (Talk - Edits Logs) (Zim_ulator and Evelyn the Modified Dog) 23:30, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
Weak For. --– Captain Hinoa (Whine) (MUN) 21:25, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Against. sry :( ---- Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer and WotM 23:34, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Weak For --The Rt. Hon. Lord Chief Justice C. Barry ('02) MUN IMGE (Complaints) 10:02, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
Against. --Guffy (guff) 12:07, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
Against - Some very bright moments, but too uneven. A promising start to the end of humanity. — Fire! 14:22, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
For. Splendid --Maggot infested testicles 13:22, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
For. Google™ --TimeStopper 23:50, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
Against

1) Too much of a list
2) Contains the word "shit" in the firskt paragraph
3) A historical event that never took place is more like an UnNews -- Swami A. Suresh 06:50, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

For. It makes me laugh. • Spang • CUN | talk • 23:05, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Against. I have to say, I liked the original more.   t o m p k i n s  blah. F@H CUN VFH CM NS MORE FOULS, LESS BOWELS 21:50, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Planet Google

Nominate and vote - Got to this through the News Links. Very funny take on a load of Google products rolled into one!--DrPoodle 19:53, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
For, as this is the second article I helped cultivate into apparently VFH-worthy stuff in one day. Hooray for me. --Spang 21:52, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
For, I will be getting my own gHouse soon. --OsirisX 02:03, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
For--this is hilarious. Nora 02:41, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
Weak for. This is kinda humorous. I recorded the news story though, so I HAVE to vote for. Regulations, and all.--> Brad Frasier National Co-Anchor CUN [talk] 18:21, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
For because --Zim_ulator (Talk - Edits Logs) (Zim_ulator and Evelyn the Modified Dog) 23:37, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
For. When I started this article, it was quite short. I'm impressed by other people's contributions, particularly the text on gHouses and the UnNews. Plus, we don't want Google to get away with a cover-up! -- Bloopy 21:21, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
Weak For. Pretty good, gotta love the first image caption.   t o m p k i n s  blah. F@H CUN VFH CM NS MORE FOULS, LESS BOWELS 21:54, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Against. Needs work, and coffee, and more coffee, and rabbits, more rabbits, and commas, lots, more, commas. -- for this crap at approximately 16:49, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
For. Excellent standard of satire throughout the article. -Conniption 10:36, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

John Cage

Nominate and Strong For - This is hysterical brilliance. It helps to know a little about Cage, but I think it'd be funny without that knowledge. Very well-written comedy. --Imrealized 07:09, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Silence... (Cough, cough.) ... ... ...For. -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 07:44, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
2+2 --Hubert Cumberdale 15:39, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
AF-FIRM-A-TIVE --2nd Lt.Yellow Dalek EX- TER- MI- NATE! (O-BEY!) 15:45, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
For, seeing as I wrote most of it. The only thing I know about John Cage is that he wrote 4'33", and that was enough to make it funny for me. --Spang 17:33, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
~~Oh, and if you vote for, a keep in its VFD entry wouldn't go amiss.~~ It won VFD. --Spang 23:00, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

For - nice addition to the composer pages :) --Lurgy 15:13, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
For. Man, this guy WAS high on kittens...--> Brad Frasier National Co-Anchor CUN [talk] 18:13, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
For. Amusing, and 4' 33" is my favorite song so I must vote yes! --Zim_ulator (Talk - Edits Logs) (Zim_ulator and Evelyn the Modified Dog) 23:48, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
For - I like to say 'exuberant' often, not just for effect, but as a real descriptor. This writing is clever and exuberant, and made me chuckle. Well done, I say, well done. — Cornet Sir Wilde Weas'l CUN VFH (Witty Remarkes) 15:17, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
For - I actually own a copy of Piano Falling Down Five Flights of Stairs in A Minor and it is some of his best work! Triddle 00:39, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
For - I've definietly heard 4'33" before. I haven't heard some of the others, but I was especially entertained by that section. --epynephrin 16:07, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
Against. Some good jokes (eg the extended dance remix of 4'33"), but it's quite badly written. Heaps of grammatical errors and sentences that don't make sense - including the first one of the article! -Conniption 10:32, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
2 squared This really is brilliant... --Johnfn 20:09, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

UnNews:Last spot in heaven taken; hundreds waitlisted

Self-nomination and for. Just testing the water. This seems like the best way to get feedback on things. And Todd's reading makes it really cool. ---- Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer and WotM 23:33, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Against. Boo religion jokes. --Joe!&MUN&F@H&KIA&C^2&N^1 04:14, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Comment Religion jokes are bad only if they are ignorant, and I did my research. ---- Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer and WotM 15:56, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

For, even if religion isn't as inherently funny as cancer, say - David Gerard 15:38, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
For - Even though God is never available for a comment. Good stuff. --Imrealized 16:19, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
For - I have never been so offended! Religion and comedy do not mix! — Fire! 16:23, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
For. Shame on your people for pointing out mathematical fallacies in a major religion. You're all going to Hell (as well as, apparently, millions of the faithful).--> Brad Frasier National Co-Anchor CUN [talk] 20:13, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
I suppose so. We definately need an UnNews featured article, this is getting insane.   t o m p k i n s  blah. F@H CUN VFH CM NS MORE FOULS, LESS BOWELS 20:49, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
For. If it's not obvious, I'm reading the recent UnNews stories I like the best (though it's been hard to resist the egotistical temptation to read all my own stories). :) ~ Todd Lyons GUN F@H etc. (yadda)³ 03:28, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
For I agree with Tompkins --The Rt. Hon. Lord Chief Justice C. Barry ('02) MUN IMGE (Complaints) 13:56, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
Mild against. It's kinda funny, but not really funny enough to be featured --Joewithajay 14:15, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
AF-FIR-MA-TIVE!!! --2nd Lt.Yellow Dalek EX- TER- MI- NATE! (O-BEY!) 15:48, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
For. An UnNews feature would be good. --Spang 18:00, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
FOR A large FOR because the article is funny, Jehovah's Witnesses are funny, and anything about God is funny. Good one. --Zim_ulator (Talk - Edits Logs) (Zim_ulator and Evelyn the Modified Dog) 23:53, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

AGAINST. Unnews should have its own highlights--Rataube 13:57, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

DON'T FEATURE UNNEWS! Anidn. Me? NO! MUN FC4 ⌘ .az VforIRCop(HOLLA ATCHA BOY!) 22:43, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Request Could you guys please vote based on the merits of the article, not on if it's UnNews? ---- Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer and WotM 00:43, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

For. I like the waitlist idea. -Conniption 10:24, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Self-aggrandizement

Self-Nominate because it is infinitely crucial to the survival of the Uncyclopedia and the entire Universe. --Sir Xiao Li CUN VFH WH NS (Talk)
For - this actually inspired me to write Humility.   – SUR  IMGECUN VFH NS jibba-jabba 02:51, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
For It's vanity, yet not. Great idea! -- – Mahroww a.k.a. Hoyetii “Art” Emerson 06:22, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
For!—Sir Mandaliet ♠ CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 07:50, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
For. While I don't think this article is quite as funny as the Humility article below, I cannot in good conscience vote it as any lower. Good job on the original idea, Xiao Li.--> Brad Frasier National Co-Anchor CUN [talk] 18:49, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
For This article beats giants.--Rataube 01:31, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Neutral. I like the concept, but it could be just as effective sustituting a general "I" in place of a user name, I think. ~ Todd Lyons GUN F@H etc. (yadda)³ 04:23, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
For, if only because of the adaptation of {{vfh}}. -- complain here 05:29, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
I, as in me cast my vote FOR this article. I insist, its the least that I can do. Dame IMGECUN VFH VFP PMS •YAP• 18:45, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
Against- To short, and how many times do I have to see that stupid tree getting hit by lightning picture in this life??--Claudius Prime 15:08, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
Against Not really all that witty. --Zim_ulator (Talk - Edits Logs) (Zim_ulator and Evelyn the Modified Dog) 12:38, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
Against - Hyperbole is a risky way to travel. — Fire! 16:42, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
For - Windmills tilt at this articles feet. --Imrealized 09:45, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
Weak against It's okay, but the whole "in-the-style-of" type thing is so Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer and WotM 00:31, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
For. The concept may not be massively original, but the use of language is great. -Conniption 10:20, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Goa Tse

Nominate. Nice riff on what you may have thought was an exhausted meme - David Gerard 17:29, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
Nein. The very word "goatse" causes me to vomit. - Sir Sikon [Guest] Ub5.10 Fx1.5 F@H NS³ FIC CM² 17:32, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
Comment. Did you read the actual article, Sikon, or are you just subscribing to the Do NOT click any links! philosophy?--> Brad Frasier National Co-Anchor CUN [talk] 17:35, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Weak against. This article is very, very well done. I just can't bring myself to vote for anything goatse-related for the front page. Especially after Yesterday...--> Brad Frasier National Co-Anchor CUN [talk] 17:35, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
Also strong against. Rocky Mountain Oysters was bad enough, then sexual innuendo, can't we keep the front page SFW? --∩intendorulez (talk) 20:01, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

"SFW?" "So Fucking What?" (yes, I know.) --2nd Lt.Yellow Dalek EX- TER- MI- NATE! (O-BEY!) 15:10, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

For.—Sir Mandaliet ♠ CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 23:28, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
For. --OsirisX 01:34, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Strong Against. --Sir Xiao Li CUN VFH WH NS (Talk) 01:55, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
For - I'm too lazy to click on the article link and want to read it on the front page. Guinness2702 02:04, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Against. It could use some more content. -- – Mahroww a.k.a. Minister Art E. Hooey 08:22, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
For. So disgusting, so wrong. But I couldn't care less.   t o m p k i n s  blah. F@H CUN VFH CM NS MORE FOULS, LESS BOWELS 17:24, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Biased but For -- KUN CUN +S VFP CM NS (yadder yadder) 17:48, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
For Enhanced by Mhaille - me too steps out of the closet. -- Swami A. Suresh 03:49, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
For with a smirking grin. -- complain here 13:05, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
For want pie now --Willy on wheels! 12:43, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
For the quotes alone are hilarious :) --Huffers 03:06, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
For Too deep for me. Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 20:30, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
For YES! good. an original take on goatse that won't make you gag. --JackMort 12:45, 10 March 2006 (GMT)
For. A Goatse on every computer in every school by 2007. -- Sir Codeine KUN VFP Bur. MDA NS UotM CM +S (Harangue) 12:58, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
Against - In what appears to be a sadly predictable trend for me. Even though the subject manner is handled cleverly, it's still one big anal sex joke at the end of the day. — Fire! 17:44, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
Weak NEG-A-TIVE. I like this. I really do. It's smart, and I laughed. But I have to agree that the front page is starting to get too predictable in its display of crassness. I'm all for smutting it up, but too much of a good thing, and all that... maybe later. Yeah, definitely later. And no, not like that, you filthy bastards. I'm a trashcan. --2nd Lt.Yellow Dalek EX- TER- MI- NATE! (O-BEY!) 15:10, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
Against. No Goatse!!!--Anon32 22:57, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
OH my fucking god, that is so disturbing! FOR! --Joe!&MUN&F@H&KIA&C^2&N^1 04:27, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
Sure --Roger The BUM MUN ⌥⌘⎋ F@H Complaints H4x0R M3! Swedish Kanaaååaåaalååaaaåaaåå Attack! 11:33, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
Against:This article is funny, but for the front page..?--Claudius Prime 15:18, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
For. Subtle and funny: I like it. --Zim_ulator (Talk - Edits Logs) (Zim_ulator and Evelyn the Modified Dog) 13:17, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
For Jump on the bandwagon. --The Rt. Hon. Lord Chief Justice C. Barry ('02) MUN IMGE (Complaints) 19:43, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
Strong Against. This would require an NSFWArticle for it to be featured, and it would mean some workplaces could block Uncyclopedia from their servers. --Sir Velair Wight 04:37, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
For Very well written. Ethereal 08:21, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
For. I didn't want to like the page, but the quotes won me over. -Conniption 17:01, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

War on Humor

Self-nomination and for. I may have waited too long to put this up for voting, but I still find the idea hilarious.--> Brad Frasier National Co-Anchor CUN [talk] 01:30, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
For - I especially like the part starting with the Jains and ending with the Teletubbies.   – SUR  IMGECUN VFH NS jibba-jabba 01:44, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
Comment Heh, yes, and I thank you for your help, Some User.--> Brad Frasier National Co-Anchor CUN [talk] 01:57, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Of Course.   t o m p k i n s  blah. F@H CUN VFH CM NS MORE FOULS, LESS BOWELS 01:46, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
Weak against. Not good enough for the front page.--Rataube 02:10, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
For. I downloaded that picture.--Mrasdfghjkl 11:24, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
For. I added the Scientologists. - David Gerard 17:35, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
-- Sir Xiao Li CUN VFH WH NS (Talk) 00:49, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
For - Because the above 4(For) is so damn hilarious to me (yes, I worked it out) --Olipro 21:06, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
Two PG Tips thumbs up. --The Rt. Hon. Lord Chief Justice C. Barry ('02) MUN IMGE (Complaints) 22:38, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
Against, it could be improved. Make it Unews, and make it like "A way on humor has been instated by the UN." --Joe!&MUN&F@H&KIA&C^2&N^1 23:24, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
For. Good writing, funny, makes fun of religion... these are the reasons it smells good to me. --Zim_ulator (Talk - Edits Logs) (Zim_ulator and Evelyn the Modified Dog) 13:52, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
For --71.213.200.43 23:10, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Against. -Conniption 13:20, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Fore! I was amused, I do see potential for expansion, but I am inspired myself.--epynephrin 16:20, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Distraction

Nomiforated -- The Village Idiot♠(talk to me) 00:35, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
   t o m p k i n s  blah. F@H CUN VFH CM NS MORE FOULS, LESS BOWELS 02:32, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Weak for I did, in fact, chortle.--> Brad Frasier National Co-Anchor CUN [talk] 02:46, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
For - nice one - David Gerard 17:40, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
Weak for. Week four?—Sir Mandaliet ♠ CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 18:01, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
AgaFornst. Speaking of four (blah blah blah)... --∩intendorulez (talk) 18:10, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
For I think... Hey guys, what's that bird over there? - Sir Sikon [Guest] Ub5.10 Fx1.5 F@H NS³ FIC CM² 18:17, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
I dig it — Fire! 17:45, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
For. Is the part about the celtics true?--Rataube 00:55, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Some of it... I had just read an article in National Geographic the night before. So, I tried to remember as best I could. So, in conclusion, there may be one or two facts in there...   t o m p k i n s  blah. F@H CUN VFH CM NS MORE FOULS, LESS BOWELS 03:38, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

For this is great! --The Rt. Hon. Lord Chief Justice C. Barry ('02) MUN IMGE (Complaints) 10:11, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
For --71.213.200.43 23:15, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Against. -Conniption 13:16, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Lincoln-Douglas Debates

This is only the second time that I've nominated my own stuff, but since it's been implied that I'm a washed up, has-been writer, I'm submitting one of my newer articles for consideration Nominate'D and For'D--Sir Slackerboya CUN VFH (talk) 21:14, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
Weak for. Made me chortle.--> Brad Frasier National Co-Anchor CUN [talk] 22:16, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
Sure. Meh.   t o m p k i n s  blah. F@H CUN VFH CM NS MORE FOULS, LESS BOWELS 22:18, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
For - David Gerard 07:52, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
For - The dialogue makes it. Makes it good. And funny. — Cornet Sir Wilde Weas'l CUN VFH (Witty Remarkes) 13:13, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
For, but is there a picture Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 22:15, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Comment I don't have photshop, and wouldn't know how to use it if I did...Paging RadicalX--Sir Slackerboya CUN VFH (talk) 14:35, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
Comment Ah, my son is home for the weekend. Better yet, he's in a mood. Perhaps if I torment him a bit he can think of something. 20:35, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Comment: I know its bad to do this, but I tweaked the article and replaced Kirk Douglas with James "Buster" Douglas, and went ahead with a graphic of Abraham Lincoln getting ready to throw a dirty punch. I hope I didn't step on toes. Dame IMGECUN VFH VFP PMS •YAP• 18:40, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
No worries pretty, I rewrited it to fit the "new" Douglas, and added more!!! Nice pic BTW

-slack

For. Amusing. --Zim_ulator (Talk - Edits Logs) (Zim_ulator and Evelyn the Modified Dog) 15:55, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
Comment Bit of a US-in house joke. --The Rt. Hon. Lord Chief Justice C. Barry ('02) MUN IMGE (Complaints) 10:13, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
For -- Bloopy 08:07, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Against. The Duplex joke was good, the rest is a wash. -Conniption 13:10, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Wildeboys

First off, don't be hatin'. I know it's Oscar Wilde (omg clichézilla!). However, take the time to read this article. Its subtlety brings me to nominate a band article, which are the bane of my existence. It's satire at its ~~best~~ ~~fairly good state~~ okay...ness. -- complain here 04:39, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
For. I wrote a cliché once, well sorta... It was kinda just one big cliché, making fun of clichés... you get the idea.   t o m p k i n s  blah. F@H CUN VFH CM NS MORE FOULS, LESS BOWELS 04:43, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
For - Light, breezy, stupid. I likes it. Cornet Sir Wilde Weas'l CUN VFH (Witty Remarkes) 15:01, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
Fourth. ~ Todd Lyons GUN etc. (UnNews) (yadda)³ 17:20, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
Weak against. Maybe I'm just in a bad mood, but this didn't make me laugh.--> Brad Frasier National Co-Anchor CUN [talk] 18:12, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
Wow.....its so rare that I get to For my own article....might as well make the most of it. :) -- KUN CUN +S VFP CM NS (yadder yadder) 21:41, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
For. And I now need to write Clichézilla. - David Gerard 07:57, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
For IMGE Sir Dawg  cun | tlk | vdp 11:06, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
For. Dunno what you were thinking of doing a band article ;p Wilde used the way he was supposed to be (wittily). --JackMort 18:17, 11 March 2006 (GMT)
For - I really enjoyed this one; then again I'm new so I am still enjoying the Wilde-thing. But this was a very unique approach. --Imrealized 11:25, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
Weak against - Anything involving Oscar Wilde is funny. But I didn't feel as if this is exerting its full humour potential. Maybe a mock discography, and other additions could make it funnier. --Charles "KaRoLuS" Tindall 12:37, 24 March 2006 (EST)
For. Funny, witty, and above all, witty. --Zim_ulator (Talk - Edits Logs) (Zim_ulator and Evelyn the Modified Dog) 16:06, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
Against. -Conniption 13:06, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
NUCLEAR AGAINST (Cancels all For Votes) What is it with the crap on VFH? --PiOfFive 13:31, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Le Corbusier

God I hate this guy. Nominate - David Gerard 14:15, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
Machine For Yes-Vote - --Some user 14:51, 21 January 2006 (UTC) (and I like the custom VFH tag, too - thanks David!)
For I don't get most of it, but I can still see the humor here.--Bradaphraser 18:13, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
For. Never heard of him, but funny nonetheless. --- 23:11, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
Ask the David Gerard 21:42, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
I'm way too lazy to click that link... could you put it on the page for us uneducated losres?--Bradaphraser 01:02, 23 January 2006 (UTC) [Done - --Some user 02:22, 24 January 2006 (UTC)]

For -- Droopy 03:40, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
Machines for voting. --Hobelhouse 00:57, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
For. Very funny. For those who don't know who he is, I think this line in Wikipedia sums it up: "Le Corbusier's theories were adopted by the builders of public housing in the United States. For the design of the buildings themselves, Le Corbusier said "by law, all buildings should be white" and criticized any effort at ornamentation." -- Rei 16:43, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
Weak For. The end is a little too repetitive, a machine of repetition.--Rataube 21:37, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
Against. Sorry but this isn't front page material.--Unissakävelijä 15:24, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 04:42, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
Weak Against. As rataube said the end's repetitive, and the rest of it is just too normal, not very twisted.   t o m p k i n s  blah. F@H CUN VFH CM NS MORE FOULS, LESS BOWELS 17:35, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
Strong For Had Corbu lived to read this, he would have dubbed it bourgeois, and thats good enough for me! Prettiestpretty 02:09, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
Purrrrrr Had he lived to see this, it certainly would have killed him. Me like. Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 20:36, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Nah. Been thinking about this one for some time now. ~ Todd Lyons GUN F@H etc. (yadda)³ 02:32, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
There's no question, I'm For it. Wait, I do have a question... what the farth took me so long to read this bleak brilliance? Loved "openable windows". --Imrealized 09:52, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
Against -- Bloopy 07:56, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
For. -Conniption 12:57, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Star Trek:Voyager

Nominated - David Gerard 13:57, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
Acknowledged. --Andrusi 17:25, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
Weak for Man, I hated this series, but the article is funny.--Bradaphraser 19:31, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
For --Caiman 17:27, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
I think I'm even done writing it now. For. --- 06:03, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
For! This is teh funnay. --Morlark MUN NS (talk) 07:54, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
For I give it a 7 out of 9! Though it sadly may be too factual, very sadly--Sir Slackerboya CUN VFH (talk) 23:38, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
For KHAAAAAAAAN! Oh, wait, wrong Trek. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 03:37, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
Weak against. The song is awesome, but the sections after that are more snarky than funny.Tom Veil 22:41, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
Comment: I see what you mean and have tried to adress this problem by adding more content that has a serious tone. --- 04:57, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Weak For. Blame Spock.   t o m p k i n s  blah. F@H CUN VFH CM NS MORE FOULS, LESS BOWELS 19:13, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
OMFGZYAIS FOR: At first glance it seemed factual and uninteresting but as soon as I actually started reading it, I came to be aware of what genius this article is. --Sir KUN UotM FH++ F@H CM GD NS Bur. +S (need help?) 04:43, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
For Although, it's probably necessary to have a basic knowledge of Voyager. Otherwise it may seem factual and uninteresting. There's a whole lot of references to pop culture, historical events, etc that make it especially funny. Very subtle humor for the most part. -- – Mahroww a.k.a. Emir Henry A. Tootsie 23:58, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
For. Despite my attempts to destroy the competition by repeated and reckless copyediting, this article is still good. ;-) Subtle, yes, but I really like that. We get plenty from the other side of the spectrum. ~ Todd Lyons GUN etc. (UnNews) (yadda)³ 05:25, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
Against - Makes me want to watch Voyager so I understand the jokes. Very well-written, though. Cornet Sir Wilde Weas'l CUN VFH (Witty Remarkes) 12:54, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
For Absolutely hilarious. --Surreal Hamster 21:06, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
For -- Bloopy 07:51, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Against. Too obscure for my liking, at least as far as the main page goes. -Conniption 12:53, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Maozilla

Chron suggested we nominated it again. I can't believe it wasn't featured. For. --Rataube 19:40, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Ok, for. I must confess, this made me laugh.--Bradaphraser 20:37, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
For Kakun 21:43, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
For --Chronarion 22:58, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
ForForFor. -- complain here 00:21, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)
For and may I say very clever too. Prettiestpretty 00:40, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)
For - I like his take on Tianemen Smowton 00:51, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)
For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 07:02, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)
For --Anidn. Me? NO! MUN FC4 ⌘ .az VforIRCop(HOLLA ATCHA BOY!) 14:08, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)
For Probably the highest quality article on this page. IMGE Sir Dawg  cun | tlk | vdp 17:32, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
32/8. Sir Sikon [Guest] Ub5.10 Fx1.5 F@H NS³ FIC CM² 16:22, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Against - (yeah, I know, this makes me a pariah here, but I just didn't find it humorous.) Insane? Check. Well-executed? Double check. But no gut-buster, this. --King In Yellow 16:50, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Delete, erh, Against. ^_^. I quite agree with KIY. I have read this article repeatedly and just cannot appreiciate it enough to be neutral on it.--Winston 20:50, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
McFeast. This is funny in its own way. Worth featuring IMVHAIO --Dr. Pepper 21:56, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
Weak Against. I hate mosters. Ever since that damn SimCity...   t o m p k i n s  blah. F@H CUN VFH CM NS MORE FOULS, LESS BOWELS 20:49, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
For. 毛主席万岁! -- Sir Xiao Li CUN VFH WH NS (Talk) 00:20, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
Against I find it hard not to say Delete sometimes.... --The Rt. Hon. Lord Chief Justice C. Barry ('02) MUN IMGE (Complaints) 20:01, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
For -- Bloopy 07:49, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
For. Some good satire in amongst the wackiness. -Conniption 12:50, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Previously Featured

That old woman next door

Featured --—Rc (Talk) 05:14, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
Amusing. --Hobelhouse 22:15, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Against. Doesn't make me laugh.--> Brad Frasier National Co-Anchor CUN [talk] 02:45, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
For --Lurgy 05:11, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
For. Been there...   t o m p k i n s  blah. F@H CUN VFH CM NS MORE FOULS, LESS BOWELS 14:56, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
For. Just because she watching me, right now. Dame IMGECUN VFH VFP PMS •YAP• 14:59, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
For. This article scares me. -- Sir Giant Hogweed [Pontificate] CUN 01:32, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
For, because that's just how I feel at the moment.   – SUR  IMGECUN VFH NS jibba-jabba 01:46, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
For - great piece of writing, original, really uses the encyclopedia parody aspect as well. Everything you could want from an exemplary Uncyclopedia feature - David Gerard 17:42, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
For. (Insert reason here.)—Sir Mandaliet ♠ CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 18:20, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
For. Wow...Bradley, you're such an ass. ;) -- – Mahroww a.k.a. Artemis Toro Heiney 21:03, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Comment. I can't help it! I didn't get enough love as a child!--> Brad Frasier National Co-Anchor CUN [talk] 18:02, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Comment. Yes you can. As Sophia tells us "To receive love, you must give love." Love The Old Woman Next Door and your life will change for the better. Dame IMGECUN VFH VFP PMS •YAP• 15:04, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

For It made me think of Grey Gables and Little Edie and all those grand old times. Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 20:32, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
For I literally laughed out loud R'son-W 07:07, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
Nah. ~ Todd Lyons GUN F@H etc. (yadda)³ 02:31, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
Against Humour? Satire? Where? --The Rt. Hon. Lord Chief Justice C. Barry ('02) MUN IMGE (Complaints) 21:15, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
For - Something most can relate to... my wife fears becoming that psycho old lady some day. --Zim_ulator (Talk - Edits Logs) (Zim_ulator and Evelyn the Modified Dog) 15:45, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
For another one I should have read before now. Funny. --Imrealized 17:18, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
For -- Bloopy 08:14, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
For. -Conniption 13:15, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
For. - Its pretty funny--Witt E, 21:12, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Hide and Go Jesus

Featured --—Rc (Talk) 05:03, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Restored Featured Article Voting After Page Was Undeleted Please forgive me Yendor33 22:30, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Nominate and For. A Jesus article that's actually novel and funny. The JesusCarton image is fantastic - David Gerard 07:57, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

For once it's not a variation of Jesus. If VFP was open, I would nominate the milk carton picture. -- osirisX Discuss 08:43, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Heh. I went to VFP to nominate the milk carton image myself - David Gerard 12:02, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

For. Yeah, this is funny.--> Brad Frasier National Co-Anchor CUN [talk] 18:07, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
For- wonderfully irreverant.--Claudius Prime 18:14, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
For. So well grounded. --Joe!&MUN&F@H&KIA&C^2&N^1 22:03, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
For. Wow, there is still original humour to be had from jesus! Who knew? --Spang 23:05, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Against I can hardly read this with all the bolding and italics, which are non-uncyclopedic as well. --—Rc (Talk) 08:24, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
Formatting goodered --—Rc (Talk) 02:43, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Against. Formatting eyesore. --Maj. Lady Katie (talk) (complain) 15:10, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

*CON-DI-TIO-NAL-NEG-A-TIVE!!! I'll reconsider supporting it if the melodramatic formatting is CHANGED!!! --2nd Lt.Yellow Dalek EX- TER- MI- NATE! (O-BEY!) 17:10, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

OK - I think I've fixed the formatting. I apologize for doing that wrong, but considered I've been at this for all of a week and a half (wiki in general, not just this site) I don't think I'm doing too bad. Yellow Dalek, thanks for giving a n00b the benefit of the doubt by letting me know there was something I could do to remedy things instead of just discouraging a newcomer by giving it an outright NO! vote. --Imrealized 17:57, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Problem solved! AF-FIR-MA-TIVE!!! (No prob, Im! Thanks for being a sport about it!) --2nd Lt.Yellow Dalek EX- TER- MI- NATE! (O-BEY!) 14:03, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

And For - I better at least encourage myself before I lose all hope (I'm not that bad, am I)... right? --Imrealized 18:15, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
I approve. But please, move the contents table. I didn't even notice it the first time I veewed this article. --Kalir, Savant of Utter Foolishness! (yell at me) 18:23, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
For. mumble... yeah, the contents table... mumble...Hah! Hide and go Jesus! --Zim_ulator (Talk - Edits Logs) (Zim_ulator and Evelyn the Modified Dog) 23:02, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
For. But first you must find my vote! Look! It's over there! You win! -- Cheer up! Hitler's still dead. 03:44, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
For Please note that Imrealized is disillusioned (his words) and trying to delete all of his work including this article. Yendor33 10:54, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
For Yeah, I like it. --The Rt. Hon. Lord Chief Justice C. Barry ('02) MUN IMGE (Complaints) 09:48, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
Against. No, for. NO! Wait a sec. Delete. No, stop. Restore. Uh... Delete. No, I've changed my mind!! Restore. Screw the drama, kids. Against. --Guffy (guff) 12:14, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
For. You had me at the title. --officer designate MUN NS CM ZM WH 18:06, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
For. > 20:31, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
For there is just something inately funny about jesus --Alia kenobi 18:57, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Archives

Archive 1
Archive 2
Archive 3
Archive 4

Awards, decorations and honours

Awards Order of Uncyclopedia · Awards, Decorations and Honours · Awards · Vote for awards, decorations and honours · Ninjastars

Ranks and honours Writer of the Month · Uncyclopedian of the Month · n00b of the month ·
Emmanuel Goldstein Award of Excellence in the Distribution of Misinformation · Foolitzer Prize · Uncyclopedian of the Year · VFS · Admin Rank · RYA · Past Winners

Limelight VFH · VFP · Best of · Top 10 · Rating System · PFP

Prix citron Useless Gobshite of the Month · Special Rules · CRP · CVP

Uncyclopedia:VFH

Contents

Current Nominations (new stuff at top, prefix votes with * )

Captain's log

Pasketmaul

Leporiphobia

What the hell is this

Little boy who lives down the street

Mozilla Firefox

Vote Fish Penis

Robot uprising

Planet Google

John Cage

UnNews:Last spot in heaven taken; hundreds waitlisted

Self-aggrandizement

Goa Tse

War on Humor

Distraction

Lincoln-Douglas Debates

Wildeboys

Le Corbusier

Star Trek:Voyager

Maozilla

Previously Featured

That old woman next door

Hide and Go Jesus

Archives

Uncyclopedia

Awards, decorations and honours
	Awards	Order of Uncyclopedia · Awards, Decorations and Honours · Awards · Vote for awards, decorations and honours · Ninjastars
	Ranks and honours	Writer of the Month · Uncyclopedian of the Month · n00b of the month · Emmanuel Goldstein Award of Excellence in the Distribution of Misinformation · Foolitzer Prize · Uncyclopedian of the Year · VFS · Admin Rank · RYA · Past Winners
	Limelight	VFH · VFP · Best of · Top 10 · Rating System · PFP
	Prix citron	Useless Gobshite of the Month · Special Rules · CRP · CVP